Archive for November, 2009

We conservatives spend a lot of time coming up with novel stories that attempt to explain lib behavior. For example, a traffic accident. A conservative and a lib are waiting for the light to change when a car slams into the light pole in front of them, ejecting the passengers through the windshield. For some odd reason both occupants of the vehicle suffer sucking chest wounds.
The conservative and lib process their responsibilities differently. The conservative walks over and place his hand over the wound on one of the victims, thus allowing him to breathe. The lib runs down the street looking for a phone to call 911 to alert the proper authorities. Later, after the ambulance has gone, both the lib and the conservative feel good about their choices. Unfortunately, while the victim the conservative attended lives and will make a full recovery, the other victim died because nobody was around to place pressure on his wound.

Even a cursory observation of liberals reveals a glaring but seeming unexplainable fact…At their very foundation, they all behave the same way. They are creatures of the same habits, much like little worker bees, slaves to the whims of the queen. If the queen says there is global warming, they shed their fur. If the queen says there is global cooling, they grow new fur. If the queen says a nearby caterpillar with several broken legs is a friend, they buzz over and spit honey into its mouth. If the queen says the caterpillar is a bad caterpillar, they fly over and sting it about 7000 times.
No original thought. They are forever prisoners of the stadium wave, a simple pixel in the broad graphic of life. 
On the other hand, more to the bright side, they have much in common with stroke victims and drunks.
If you have lived long enough, at some point you have tried to have a meaningful conversation with a drunk or stroke victim. After a time, you found that this proved impossible because even though these people were attentive, they simply did not understand what you were saying.
Whereas there would be some hope for an eventual meaningful conversation between an English speaking person and an Urdu native of Africa who only speaks Urdish, there could not be and never would be a useful exchange of data between either the English speaking person or the proud Urdu native and a drunk or massive stroke victim. The aforementioned victims see and hear, but they process the information in strange ways.

A recent study performed by the prestigious UC/AL (University of Cowchip/AL) found that the probable cause of liberalism is “arrested development.”
This from a grant of several millions of dollars of stimulus money.
The startling evidence they produced is that we are ALL born liberals. (Rush Limbaugh perhaps being the only person of note to be born conservative.)
Approximately 50-60% of all American humans outgrow this perfectly normal stage of development by their early 20′s.

The rest…sadly, remain stuck in the pre-adolescent ways of thinking. One theory is that the stunted libs, in their early childhood all ate lead containing paint chips flaking from painted window sills.

What they found in their research was the well known child developmental phenom, “Just Because” continues throughout life with the common lib.
When a child offers a theory, and is challenged for proof, the universal answer is, “Just because.”
For them, it’s a discussion ender. If pushed, they become sullen, silent, and their eyes glaze over. All parents know this to be true.
Later in life, when an adult lib offers a cockamamie theory, and is challenged by a mature conservative, all they have to offer is some version of “Just because.” If pushed they become silent, sullen, and their eyes glaze over.
The conclusion by the august research professionals at the UC/AL was that ingestion of lead containing paint chips caused the continuing and devastating condition common to ALL liberals wherein they process information differently from mature thinking conservatives. While some libs are happy in their special developmentally challenged state, others suffer from depression and confusion, sometimes caused by their own actions.

From our perspective, as long as liberals are kept from their own destructive devices, ergo, not allowed into the playroom, as had been the case until 1968 or so, the country progresses.
However, when allowed to run rampant, and even to control access to the playroom, all suffer…and none more than the liberals. Unable to manipulate the Mr. Potatohead parts they quickly become alltoghether sad, depressed, and confused. They are the first to mewl, whine, and yelp for help from responsible adult conservatives. And they mewl, whine, and yelp loudly indeed. Of course, when the conservative puts their toys back to right, the libs blame them for tearing them up in the first place and go back to tearing them up once more. 
But conservatives now know the genesis, and outcome of untethered liberals. They know all of it…now. Sometimes conservatives forget to suffer not the strange little children. For while liberals make excellent dancers and worker bees, they make lousy leaders.

If you watched the recent series on the History Channel about WWII in color and HD, one thing you came away with was the enormity of the challenge. In comparison, Iraq and Afghanistan wouldn’t be much more than backwater skirmishes to be settled quickly. So, what is the difference in then and now?
The difference lies in the constitution of our leadership. What it takes to win a war is a man (or woman) with ruthlessness at their core.
Sure, FDR was the consummate schmoozer with the American people, but when it came to winning the war, as he had to, their wasn’t one ounce of pity for the enemy. He had it in mind to take care of business and bring the guys home, even if his strategery guaranteed that a lot of them weren’t coming back. In hindsight, if we had lain off the beaches on some of those Pacific islands for an extra week, a lot of the enemy would have died of thirst. But that wasn’t the policy.
Boldness has limits. Boldness that leads to stupidity is not a noble trait.
With that said, weakness has its limits as well. Bush went into office with the idea of working with the liberals. That policy didn’t last but a year or so. Bush’s plan B was to ignore them for his last 7 years. That didn’t work very well, did it? Much like lax discipline with naughty children, his politeness, niceness, and weakness emboldened them. When a clever and self destructive juvenile sets a match to the house, he manages to put everyone on the street.
Conservatives crave leadership, and bold leadership at that. They want a leader who doesn’t ignore the foolishness of the left.
When the left does dumb things, as they must, conservatives want their leadership to call them on it, and in the most public way….
They want their leaders to take up for themselves. Is that too much to ask? Diplomacy be damned. Sometimes the left is a little thick.
The man or woman who demonstrates leadership and the ability to not ignore the left wins in a landslide every time.

In many places around the world, even elementary aged school children will tell you that the world’s problems are caused by the Jewish conspiracy. When fully grown, though, they will still have a hard time, if pressed, to explain just exactly what a Jewish conspiracy is. By then they may or may not be a fanatic Jew hater.
Maybe they will only be a Jew distruster.
Muslims worldwide historically have had an abiding hatred and loathing of all Jews. I don’t know the ratio of true fanatic Muslim Jew haters to Muslims who just don’t like them very much, but recent history would indicate that it is more than less. Most Muslims in Muslim countries have never met a Jew, so one might ask why do they hate them so much?
The simple answer, of course, is religious fanaticism and voluminous ignorance. In its essence, it is the same exact phenomena that allows for Bush haters. As a studied conservative, you know that when a Bush hater is pressed for a reason, he never has one. Period. It’s universal with them. Which brings me back to the Jewish hatred question.
How can someone wake up in the morning with a blanket hatred of all Jews when he has never even met one? Well, it happens.

Let’s bring it on home. White on black. Black on white. White on American Indian. Vice versa. Look within yourself and imagine how it would be to walk around hating an entire race of people…and you don’t even know anything about them.
If you live in a large northeastern city, you think everybody is every color everywhere, but it is a fact that there are plenty of pockets around the United States where locals are insulated and rarely if ever see people of other races. It’s hard for them to hate races they don’t know, and if one of them do, then you must label him a weirdo. Right?
But, in many insulated countries around the world there are Jew haters. They hate them so much that they wish they would all die in agony or at least just die. Some even build atomic weapons to help the cause along…….

There is absolutely nothing externally that can be done to convince a Jew hater to change their ways. Same goes for American Bush haters. I’m speaking of hating Bush the man, not Bush the president. It’s ingrained and genetic with these people. You can see the smoldering light of hate in their eyes when the subject comes up.
So, to the point. Here’s the problem with dealing with people who think like that. They may be normal in every other way, charming, smiling, laughing and inviting you into their homes for tea, but for that one little thing.
You must consider who you are dealing with. If they are that willing to pull the pin on a whole other race (Your choice, Jewish, black, white, red…) then why do you think with them that you are any different? After they get through nuking the people they hate, what’s to stop them from hating you next? An unreasoning, fanatic, ignorant hate that you can’t do one blessed thing about.
The American people, who for the most part, understand the concept of hate, but are not haters, must grow up and understand that we live in a hard and unforgiving world. Our leaders must act like grown men and women and challenge themselves every day to understand the dangers…and opportunities in the larger world. They need to get off their insulated Washington butts and see the bigger picture, so that when the crisis comes, they’ll not be saying that they never saw it coming, even though they had been warned…repeatedly.
Besides fanaticism, there is just common ordinary hard headed stupidity too. In Washington it is the eternal picnic where our leaders are always busy flicking ants off the tater salad while, unseen, all around them in plain sight, a herd of menacing elephants are slowly sneaking up on them with the intent of mashing out their very living guts.
When they are laying there with their guts mashed out, health care won’t seem so important then. 

As bad as elephants can be, there are far far worse things out there…unreasoning hateful things…grownup bad things, yearning for the destruction of America…..while our trusting and child like Washington leaders busy themselves with the tater salad.

Like you, 15 times a day I hear of Obama things that make me want to bust an appendix, but, I control myself fairly well. I don’t run here 15 times a day, though I think about it. I mean, I do have other things to do.
BUT...Of all Obama things we like best, one must admit that the Health Care Debacle along with Cap and Trade and Stimulus One and Stimulus Two are nation killers.
However, the latest news has once again set me to spraying spittle in the general direction of the telly, and I know if I start laughing, I can’t stop. Has anyone in the formidable Obama Circle of Insiders ever heard of…

Please, if you agree with any portion of this…or as much of it as makes sense, please let me know in writing. Click below and make a comment. I promise not to tell anyone, (unless they threaten to water board me or worse, send me to NY) who you are. 

Some folk’s definition of nuts is anyone who challenges the status quo. It had been my observation, through painful experience, that they are often right.
A politically incorrect conservative blog, during the reign of Obama and his leftist wacko minions may be another definition of nuts.
However, this is not always the case. Sometimes right does triumph over wrong, particularly when it is gross wrong. I have seen this happen with my own disbelieving formerly cynical eyes. One good person, doing good, can make a good difference.
On the other hand, one bad person can cause a lot of grief…
My definition of nuts is Jihadists who think they know what’s best. The most recent Jihadist of fame, Major Hasan, is a prime example. He not only took the life of his victims, but also stole away a goodly portion of life from their families and friends. He has even taken some of ours, as we’re spending time worrying with him when we have so much else on our plates. In America, we have a remedy for unbelievers…It is called THE VOTE. It is said he was a poor student in school. Perhaps he was asleep during civics class when that was taught. Ummn…do they still do civics? Mmm mmm mmm?

Another definition of nuts are legislators who think they know what’s best, when it runs contrary to the popular will of their constituents.
Like many Americans, when I was younger, I thought we lived in a pure democracy where an elected official had to do the will of the people.
It was a painful lesson for me to learn that we actually live in a representative democracy where we elect an individual and bestow on him the power to do our collective bidding…however, no guarantees that he will.
More than once, wise local officials (after they had been voted in) patiently explained to me that they were elected to “vote their conscience”, not my will.

Hmmn….Vote their conscience and not mine…

This is all well and good, as long as it works and they think like we do. The problem is that as most always happens, over time, even good men succumb to the pleasures of power, and think their conscience is a better guide than the popular sentiment.
When this happens, it’s time for them to go, with our thanks…but go.
In years past, many of us were too lazy or content, or cynical…you name it…to send them packing. But, my how times change.
Incumbent…my message to you is NO MORE. Dust off your trunks. The train is coming and when it leaves, we want you on it. We’re going to put a new man into your slot, and when he misbehaves, we’ll send him packing too. This time, at least for a time, we’re going to have it our way for a change.