Democrats – The Final Solution
Democrats – The Final Solution
Recently, Hannity sucked the brilliant TeaParty favorite, Rep Michele Bachmann into a one on one gabfest with left wing lunatic Republican hater Debbie Wasserman Schultz. This came on the heels of a similar run in between the two plus Anthony Weiner on one of those Sunday shows.
Hannity, above all of his other laudable traits is first a showman in the vein of Messrs Barnum and Bailey.
This was a vast tactical mistake on the part of Bachmann. Shame on Hannity.
The answer to the democrat problem is simple. Ignore them. Treat them like belly button lint. That’s all they deserve.
We outnumber the liberals. We have the microphone, the spotlight, the stage. TeaParty members clearly believe the mushy proclivities of the Republicans helped to bring the nation to it’s present swampy state of affairs.
Just ignore the democrats like you would a smelly flea paddling around in a cup of day old coffee. Ignore them like a wilted stalk of celery. You might as well try to reason with a chirping cricket. All you’re ever going to get is…chirp. Total waste of time.
Why ignore them? Because every time you acknowledge their mutinous chirpings, you give them power, and they don’t deserve it. From the mouths of these babes spews forth only calamitous madness.
We have employed, for our amusement, and often horror, the likes of Rush and Beck to comment on the mewlings of the left. They are paid well to keep us informed and enlightened as to their nefarious ways.
Our elected representatives, who are also paid handsomely, are paid to take care of the nation’s business, or better, just leave it alone. They aren’t paid to have one on ones with goofy democrats. It’s a waste of time that they could be devoting to undoing the dastardly schemes laid upon us these last few years by these clinically diagnosed chirping maniacs.
However, at all times, we must ignore the democrats with civility.
________________________
Diet Food Delivered How Do I Make Money On Facebook
Most Conservative Website In America: Rush Limbaugh Evolves
Rush Evolves
Rush Limbaugh Evolves
Over this year, Rush has slowly come around to the position I held before I met Rush, and that is…Vote for the best candidate. (With caveats.)
Through the march of years we have seen Rush go from fat to thin to fat to thin. We have followed his marriages. He’s let us in on little snips of his life, drugs, hearing loss. We have had countless discussions with friends and relatives over his wise sayings. Our lives have changed as a direct result of Rush. We remember the very first time we ever heard him on the radio, and what we were doing. We remember who turned us onto him. Rush has become a family member, once removed.
Over the past year, with the advent of the Tea Party, Rush has changed, or evolved, once again.
When I first made his acquaintance, 20 or so years ago, I was sitting in my car. My wife was inside a burger dive at a crossroads a dozen miles from the house purchasing a couple of burger baskets. We were out for our weekly car ride.
At the time, Rush was speaking to us with protected verbiage. He had a rubber over his golden EIB microphone, so as to keep his listeners from hearing something they didn’t want to hear. I was so shocked and flabbergasted that when my wife appeared at the car door I nearly fell over myself turning off the radio. Not that I was a dainty daisy, mind you, but I was a virgin Rush listener.
It wasn’t long until I dived back into Rush with a vengeance, and have been a fan ever since.
Twenty years ago, I had already made a longtime successful migration to the Republican party with the vast majority of the old time Alabama democrats. It was a real struggle in reordering my thinking. But I never looked back. Rush quickly became a welcome daily delight.
One thing Professor Limbaugh did was to change my longtime thinking that began in my youth. Whereas, like many neophyte voters, I proudly boasted that I didn’t vote for the party….I voted for he best candidate. The theory of “wasting a vote” didn’t mean anything to me.
Rush, though, has always insisted that you DO NOT vote for the best candidate. His theory has always been that you vote strategically. That is, vote for the Republican with the best chance to win, so as to defeat the democrat.
I saw the logic of his argument. In all cases afterward, I happily flipped the the R lever whenever given the chance. No thinking necessary. Just whang down that R lever, and go on about my business.
Rush Limbaugh’s “evolution” began a couple of years after the big turnover in 1994 when it started to become clear that the Republicans we voted in at that time had an agenda of their own, that being, to see how fast they could spend the country broke, much as the guys they replaced. It was an embarrassing time.
Rush stuck by his guns. So, we held our noses and voted for Bob Dole in 1996. I clearly remember that my feelings at the time was that Dole was the hand picked Republican candidate for President because the Republican party “owed him.” To this day, I believe there were better candidates. I felt cheated, and I couldn’t understand why he won state after state, except that the fix was in and the card carrying Republicans were marching in lock step to orders from on high.
For our trouble, we got eight unbelievable years of Bill Clinton, who fundamentally damaged our nation in ways that still shake out for years to come.
Next came George Bush who was clearly and obviously a middle of the road Republican. He wasn’t my first choice. Yet, he won state after state.
Now, with the nation in peril, there comes the national Tea Party movement. The single unifying thrust is that we no longer vote party. We vote whoever is the most conservative.
Coming back to Rush. For much of his career, he has counseled to vote for the candidate with the best chance to win. His theory, which today I hear was one advanced by none other than his personal hero, William Francis Buckley. It’s called the Buckley Rule, so they say. Rush plainly took it to heart.
Normally, I suppose it is a good enough rule, but these are anything but normal times.
Today, I heard Rush give an impassioned plea to vote not for the obvious Republican candidate, or the candidate that would supposedly have the best chance to defeat the democrat. Today Rush fully toed the Tea Party line and told us to vote for the MOST CONSERVATIVE candidate, come what may later in the general election.
It may seem like a small thing to you, but let me assure you it is not. This is a wholesale shift in gray matter for the robot leader. It also just happens to reflect my thinking as well.
As Rush put it, more or less, what good is it to vote in a Republican that votes like a democrat? We’re no better off.
Perhaps in another 20 years, the Republican party come hell or high water faithful will comprehend this as well.
For the rest of us. As Rush evolves…So do we all.
Forbes Prudent Speculator New York City Pass Fluke 87
Most Conservative Blog – Restoring Honor – Glenn Beck
I watched all of Glenn Beck’s Restoring Honor rally this past Saturday morning with the intensity and pleasure of a pious church goer at his favorite church.
I was raised in church and have spent the better part of my life in same, but I’m not what you would call pious. However, Glenn Beck’s multi-denominational rally struck just the right chord. It struck a chord that I have not experienced in a long time. It was truly a blessing. If you were fortunate enough to be able to watch it on CSPANN or on Facebook, you know what I mean.
After, the usual suspects in the news media began their usual hatchet jobs. Some of the articles that were available on Saturday, post the rally, looked as if they were written before the rally. Indeed, they could have been.
Saturday afternoon, just after the 300-500,000 person rally ended, CBS News reported that exactly 87,000 people attended the Restoring Honor rally, which was less than the 100,000 that Beck had predicted. Too bad, Glenn.
Saturday night, Grrraldo rounded up the Rev. Al Sharpton, a Baptist Minister. (Where is Reverend Sharpton’s church? Can someone tell me?) Reverend Sharpton flopped around like a beached carp on the matter of the rally. You’ve seen his interviews.
Sunday, President Obama said he had not watched any of the Restoring Honor rally. He characterized the attendees as folks who are dissatisfied with the way things are going, and said that they are “easily led.” He dismissed them saying that you find them in any time of distress. No big deal.
The Shine Is Off Our Imams
I expected the usual left wing media culprits to dismiss Beck and the Restoring Honor rally. More, I expected (but fervently hoped I would be proven wrong) the usual suspects on our side to do the same.
I’m disappointed beyond measure at the response of our own leaders, those people being Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levin.
I listened to the first hour of Levin and he did not mention the Restoring Honor rally. If later, he did, I”ll be more than happy to retract or revise.
Rush Limbaugh could not be contacted for his reaction, because he’s off on another golf frolic, this time for a week and a half. He also mentioned Thursday’s show that he’d be taking off in November for another. November? Tell me that I heard that wrong. Please.
Best of all, Sean Hannity said Monday to a caller that he hadn’t had time to listen to much of the rally Saturday because he was busy. That’s fair enough, because he had just come off his own tour.
But let’s be candid. It’s quite in line for the “mainstream media” to behave the way they did about the rally. We lament their behavior bitterly. But what about our own leaders?
Rush spends more and more time wheel’s up lately, so I wonder where his head really is at times. Levin gives the appearance that he hates Beck. Hannity shys away from anything Beck much as you or I would a poisonous snake.
I’m not calling for a love fest. I’m not even calling for these very competitive leaders to cooperate. But I am calling for common courtesy. When Levin and Hannity IGNORE something as massive as the Restoring Honor rally, they are also ignoring their own base. They, in effect say that we don’t matter.
When you ask our leaders, “What about that Restoring Honor rally?” and they respond, “What rally?” it’s time for an adjustment.
If the peril the nation faces isn’t enough to foster at least a courteous common cause among the people we look to for news and guidance, then their council must be tempered with the knowledge that they have agendas above what is apparent.
Frankly, I expect better, and more from these men. For example, Rush is in no position to make judgments about Obama’s multitudinous vacations. Rush has diminished himself, at least in my eyes, on this topic. (Rush would have a belly laugh over what *I* think.) Likewise, I must filter whatever Hannity says through a petty filter. And Levin… Levin most of all disappoints, because side by side, there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between his views and those of Beck.
So, please don’t think that is just me. Liberals the nation over take comfort when our leaders dis each other…and in the case of the Restoring Honor rally, the half million who attended and the untold others who watched on CSPANN and Facebook.
What in God’s name are these men thinking? Now is the time for unity. A nation of conservatives are in harmony. Is it not right to ask at least a portion from the men we turn to for advice and leadership in this, the most important political times in the last 150 years? I can’t take a man seriously who doesn’t return the favor.
