Recently, Hannity sucked the brilliant TeaParty favorite, Rep Michele Bachmann into a one on one gabfest with left wing lunatic Republican hater Debbie Wasserman Schultz. This came on the heels of a similar run in between the two plus Anthony Weiner on one of those Sunday shows.

Hannity, above all of his other laudable traits is first a showman in the vein of Messrs Barnum and Bailey.

This was a vast tactical mistake on the part of Bachmann. Shame on Hannity.

The answer to the democrat problem is simple. Ignore them. Treat them like belly button lint. That’s all they deserve.

We outnumber the liberals. We have the microphone, the spotlight, the stage. TeaParty members clearly believe the mushy proclivities of the Republicans helped to bring the nation to it’s present swampy state of affairs.

Just ignore the democrats like you would a smelly flea paddling around in a cup of day old coffee.  Ignore them like a wilted stalk of celery. You might as well try to reason with a chirping cricket. All you’re ever going to get is…chirp. Total waste of time.

Why ignore them? Because every time you acknowledge their mutinous chirpings, you give them power, and they don’t deserve it. From the mouths of these babes spews forth only calamitous madness.

We have employed, for our amusement, and often horror, the likes of Rush and Beck to comment on the mewlings of the left. They are paid well to keep us informed and enlightened as to their nefarious ways.

Our elected representatives, who are also paid handsomely, are paid to take care of the nation’s business, or better, just leave it alone. They aren’t paid to have one on ones with goofy democrats. It’s a waste of time that they could be devoting to undoing the dastardly schemes laid upon us these last few years by these clinically diagnosed chirping maniacs.

However, at all times, we must ignore the democrats with civility.

________________________

Diet Food Delivered How Do I Make Money On Facebook

My friends. Have you ever wondered who’s face is on Facebook?

Spoiler Alert: This is an ATP Profit Center Timeout —

I can tell you most assuredly that it is a burning issue in the minds of 19% of the populace of this nation of ours. Each afternoon they drag out of bed, put on their aluminum foil panties and turn on the television to the afternoon cartoons. Then, they lay down on the couch, not paying the least attention to the animated flickers, and ponder the face on Facebook. Who is it? What does it mean?

According to Albus Dumbledore, eminent, but dead tricker, the face that stares back is what the the viewer wants it to be. Thus, if a callous pock faced youth wishes he were a ballerina, then his face on Facebook would be that of a youthful and fresh faced dancer.

It’s not so very difficult, really, for you can upload any photo you like to be your face on Facebook. My face on Facebook is actually…me. Fancy that. It’s not that I enjoy looking at myself looking back at me, you understand. It’s just that at that particular time on that particular day I was feeling serious. It passed, but the photo remains, a testament to my serious moment.

However, this article you probably stopped reading about five minutes ago is not dedicated to myself. It is dedicated to the face on Facebook

The unbiased authority on who is the face on Facebook is, of course, the impartial source, Google.

Keep in mind that this, your MOST CONSERVATIVE BLOG in all of America has been at the very top of Page 1 for Yahoo and Bing for months.  However you can’t find it on Google. This proves Google is impartial. They don’t list the most conservative blogs. But I wander…

Actually, if you visit friend Google and type in “the face on facebook” and click on images…you get this:

Naturally, this is of no help whatever. You get a bunch of silhouettes. According to Google, it could be anyone. Personally, I believe they are trying to hide the face on Facebook. According to the aluminum foil pantie types, it’s exactly what they are trying to do. It’s just what you’d expect of them…to hide the face on Facebook in plain sight.

Not to worry my friends. I have been very successful at peeling away the mysterious layers of electrons hiding the actual face on Facebook. I know who it is, and I’m telling. It’s a secret so sensitive that I have probably mentioned it elsewhere on this very website. That ought to send you running to the old search box to verify this sentence. But no need my friend! I’m about to divulge the the pulse pounding secret!

The face on Facebook is RUSH ON FACEBOOK. Yes, the face on Facebook is none other than Rush Limbaugh. I have researched this burning issue thoroughly and developed an el Freebo report just for your curious eyes. It is so forceful and direct that I hesitate to even place it here into electronic print.

However, if you MUST see for yourself, you have to only but click the following link….   Rush On Facebook …

BTW, when you visit, you might notice that it is a little light on ads. I have purposefully kept them to the absolute bare minimum. I am waiting on just one more teensy little dating website place to send me their offer so that I may post it. I reason that anyone reading about Rush on Facebook, who’s stated reason to be on Facebook is to show off his wedding photos, must inevitably be interested in getting married themselves. How better to find the perfect crush than on a dating website?? It is this sort of excellent service that you will come to expect when you regularly visit Rush On Facebook. El woofo my friends!

This profit center timeout was brought to you by: Webhosting and by  Realtor Listings Alabama and of course by  New York Pass

Rush Evolves

Rush Limbaugh Evolves

Over this year, Rush has slowly come around to the position I held before I met Rush, and that is…Vote for the best candidate.  (With caveats.)

Through the march of years we have seen Rush go from fat to thin to fat to thin. We have followed his marriages. He’s let us in on little snips of his life, drugs, hearing loss. We have had countless discussions with friends and relatives over his wise sayings. Our lives have changed as a direct result of Rush. We remember the very first time we ever heard him on the radio, and what we were doing. We remember who turned us onto him. Rush has become a family member, once removed.

Over the past year, with the advent of the Tea Party, Rush has changed, or evolved, once again.

When I first made his acquaintance, 20 or so years ago, I was sitting in my car. My wife was inside a burger dive at a crossroads a dozen miles from the house purchasing a couple of burger baskets. We were out for our weekly car ride.

At the time, Rush was speaking to us with protected verbiage. He had a rubber over his golden EIB microphone, so as to keep his listeners from hearing something they didn’t want to hear. I was so shocked and flabbergasted that when my wife appeared at the car door I nearly fell over myself turning off the radio. Not that I was a dainty daisy, mind you, but I was a virgin Rush listener.

It wasn’t long until I dived back into Rush with a vengeance, and have been a fan ever since.

Twenty years ago, I had already made a longtime successful migration to the Republican party with the vast majority of the old time Alabama democrats. It was a real struggle in reordering my thinking. But I never looked back.  Rush quickly became a welcome daily delight.

One thing Professor Limbaugh did was to change my longtime thinking that began in my youth. Whereas, like many neophyte voters, I proudly boasted that I didn’t vote for the party….I voted for he best candidate. The theory of “wasting a vote” didn’t mean anything to me.

Rush, though, has always insisted that you DO NOT vote for the best candidate. His theory has always been that you vote strategically. That is, vote for the Republican with the best chance to win, so as to defeat the democrat.

I saw the logic of his argument. In all cases afterward, I happily flipped the the R lever whenever given the chance. No thinking necessary. Just whang down that R lever, and go on about my business.

Rush Limbaugh’s “evolution” began a couple of years after the big turnover in 1994 when it started to become clear that the Republicans we voted in at that time had an agenda of their own, that being, to see how fast they could spend the country broke, much as the guys they replaced. It was an embarrassing time.

Rush stuck by his guns. So, we held our noses and voted for Bob Dole in 1996. I clearly remember that my feelings at the time was that Dole was the hand picked Republican candidate for President because the Republican party “owed him.” To this day, I believe there were better candidates. I felt cheated, and I couldn’t understand why he won state after state, except that the fix was in and the card carrying Republicans were marching in lock step to orders from on high.

For our trouble, we got eight unbelievable years of Bill Clinton, who fundamentally damaged our nation in ways that still shake out for years to come.

Next came George Bush who was clearly and obviously a middle of the road Republican. He wasn’t my first choice. Yet, he won state after state.

Now, with the nation in peril, there comes the national Tea Party movement. The single unifying thrust is that we no longer vote party. We vote whoever is the most conservative.

Coming back to Rush. For much of his career, he has counseled to vote for the candidate with the best chance to win. His theory, which today I hear was one advanced by none other than his personal hero, William Francis Buckley. It’s called the Buckley Rule, so they say. Rush plainly took it to heart.

Normally, I suppose it is a good enough rule, but these are anything but normal times.

Today, I heard Rush give an impassioned plea to vote not for the obvious Republican candidate, or the candidate that would supposedly have the best chance to defeat the democrat. Today Rush fully toed the Tea Party line and told us to vote for the MOST CONSERVATIVE candidate, come what may later in the general election.

It may seem like a small thing to you, but let me assure you it is not. This is a wholesale shift in gray matter for the robot leader. It also just happens to reflect my thinking as well.

As Rush put it, more or less, what good is it to vote in a Republican that votes like a democrat? We’re no better off.

Perhaps in another 20 years, the Republican party come hell or high water faithful will comprehend this as well.

For the rest of us. As Rush evolves…So do we all.

Forbes Prudent Speculator New York City Pass Fluke 87

I watched all of Glenn Beck’s Restoring Honor rally this past Saturday morning with the intensity and pleasure of a pious church goer at his favorite church.

I was raised in church and have spent the better part of my life in same, but I’m not what you would call pious. However, Glenn Beck’s multi-denominational rally struck just the right chord. It struck a chord that I have not experienced in a long time. It was truly a blessing. If you were fortunate enough to be able to watch it on CSPANN or on Facebook, you know what I mean.

After, the usual suspects in the news media began their usual hatchet jobs. Some of the articles that were available on Saturday, post the rally, looked as if they were written before the rally. Indeed, they could have been.

Saturday afternoon, just after the 300-500,000 person rally ended, CBS News reported that exactly 87,000 people attended the Restoring Honor rally, which was less than the 100,000 that Beck had predicted. Too bad, Glenn.

Saturday night, Grrraldo rounded up the Rev. Al Sharpton, a Baptist Minister. (Where is Reverend  Sharpton’s church? Can someone tell me?)  Reverend Sharpton flopped around like a beached carp on the matter of the rally. You’ve seen his interviews.

Sunday, President Obama said he had not watched any of the Restoring Honor rally. He characterized the attendees as folks who are dissatisfied with the way things are going, and said that they are “easily led.” He dismissed them saying that you find them in any time of distress.  No big deal.

The Shine Is Off Our Imams

I expected the usual left wing media culprits to dismiss Beck and the Restoring Honor rally. More, I expected (but fervently hoped I would be proven wrong) the usual suspects on our side to do the same.

I’m disappointed beyond measure at the response of our own leaders, those people being Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark Levin.

I listened to the first hour of Levin and he did not mention the Restoring Honor rally. If later, he did, I”ll be more than happy to retract or revise.

Rush Limbaugh could not be contacted for his reaction, because he’s off on another golf frolic, this time for a week and a half. He also mentioned Thursday’s show that he’d be taking off in November for another. November? Tell me that I heard that wrong. Please.

Best of all, Sean Hannity said Monday to a caller that he hadn’t had time to listen to much of the rally Saturday because he was busy. That’s fair enough, because he had just come off his own tour.

But let’s be candid. It’s quite in line for the “mainstream media” to behave the way they did about the rally. We lament their behavior bitterly. But what about our own leaders?

Rush spends more and more time wheel’s up lately, so I wonder where his head really is at times. Levin gives the appearance that he hates Beck. Hannity shys away from anything Beck much as you or I would a poisonous snake.

I’m not calling for a love fest. I’m not even calling for these very competitive leaders to cooperate. But I am calling for common courtesy. When Levin and Hannity IGNORE something as massive as the Restoring Honor rally, they are also ignoring their own base. They, in effect say that we don’t matter.

When you ask our leaders, “What about that Restoring Honor rally?” and they respond, “What rally?” it’s time for an adjustment.

If the peril the nation faces isn’t enough to foster at least a courteous common cause among the people we look to for news and guidance, then their council must be tempered with the knowledge that they have agendas above what is apparent.

Frankly, I expect better, and more from these men. For example, Rush is in no position to make judgments about Obama’s multitudinous vacations. Rush has diminished himself, at least in my eyes, on this topic.  (Rush would have a belly laugh over what *I* think.) Likewise, I must filter whatever Hannity says through a petty filter.  And Levin… Levin most of all disappoints, because side by side, there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between his views and those of Beck.

So, please don’t think that is just me. Liberals the nation over take comfort when our leaders dis each other…and in the case of the Restoring Honor rally, the half million who attended and the untold others who watched on CSPANN and Facebook.

What in God’s name are these men thinking? Now is the time for unity. A nation of conservatives are in harmony. Is it not right to ask at least a portion from the men we turn to for advice and leadership in this, the most important political times in the last 150 years? I can’t take a man seriously who doesn’t return the favor.

This is something I have been pondering pretty much since founding the AlabamaTeaParty.org blog, but more so lately. What I’m about to say ought to stir up a little controversy…

Study the chalk board…

The other day, Rush said something interesting. He said that he is THE Conservative. Therefore, the rest of the talking heads could only be niches built off the word conservative. Get it?

Niche was a man who I think lived back in the 1800′s somewhere in Germany or somewhere else and wrote some really strange books. Stuff like that.

Today the word “niche” means “subset.” Subset means, “kinda like, but not exactly the same…Complimentary.”

As an example, in my world, if the word jelly is already taken as a website name, then I might look for a jelly niche word like… grape jelly. That’s a subset of jelly, but it still packs plenty of jelly goodness.

Not to belabor the point, in the talking head circles, if Rush is Conservative, then the others out there can only be niches of Conservative. That’s what’s left. Point well taken.

That being the case, if you want to be a conservative talk show host, you have to pick a subset or niche talk show host description and gig. The chalkboard illustrates what I believe to be the current subsets of the superstars.

After Rush, there is the second tier.

Taking nothing away from less well known conservative talk show guys, the bottom row on the chalk board  illustrates my take on the Fox evening lineup, excluding Greta. I would have included her, but I ran out of room.

Anyway, can you guess who I’m talking about on the old chalkboard up there? Hmmn?

Not to get the wrong idea. I like them all. But some are…exasperating at times. That’s my opinion.

On a completely different topic, I’m completely taken with Glenn Beck. It is not arguable that watching him is like taking a college course. Some of us (AlabamaTeaParty.org) even have homework. The AlabamaTeaParty.org website is my homework.

Rush says, and well he should, that he is show prep for the rest of the media…but show prep for Rush should be Glenn Beck.

Rush seemed to have been quite pleased with Beck early on, but that seems to have worn off. Witness that occasionally Rush will toss out something as news that we learned on Beck days earlier.

I lamented recently that I longed for the days when we didn’t have to know so much about the inner workings of the socialist radical mind. At the same time I marveled at how far we have come in only two short years, thanks to Beck. Were it not for him, most of us would be oblivious to the hows and whys of the radical things going on around us.

Beck has lain down a master level study of the mind of the liberal/radical/progressive for us all to see and learn from. Countless times he has dropped a dime on the friends of darkness.

Beck has almost single-handedly carried all of us back to school. In comparison, Rush speaks in Cliff notes. Which is NOT to take away from Rush.

But Rush’s brilliant mind is not on biz sometimes… On Thursday July 15th, Rush spent most of the show belly aching about his Ipod or Padeye cellphone.  It was vital and important information for us all. Of course, at the end of the show Rush allowed that he would not be there Friday, for he instead would be on his G5 jet drinking wine and champagne at 51,000 feet. Rush is a party kind of guy any more.

If Rush is the high octane fuel in our engines, then Beck is nitrous oxide that makes us race cars.  Dumb analogy unless you’re a NASCAR fan. Then it all becomes very clear indeed!